Tue. Sep 30th, 2025

The “Great” Debate: Neil Magny’s Historic, Yet Contentious, Victory at UFC Perth

UFC Perth delivered a spectacle not just of athletic prowess, but of unprecedented controversy, when a referee`s snap decision and subsequent reversal reshaped the narrative of a pivotal welterweight bout, culminating in a historic, yet heavily debated, victory for Neil Magny.

The fight card at UFC Perth was already promising, but few could have predicted the dramatic turn of events that would unfold during the welterweight clash between the seasoned contender Neil Magny and Australia`s own Jake Matthews. This wasn`t just another fight; it was a testament to the unpredictable nature of mixed martial arts, where a single moment of human judgment can send ripples through an entire event.

A Near-Stoppage That Wasn`t: The Guillotine Choke Controversy

As the first round drew to a close, Matthews, fueled by the home crowd`s energy, secured a deep guillotine choke on Magny. In the high-stakes environment of the Octagon, referees are tasked with instantaneous decisions to protect fighters. Observing what appeared to be a `limp-like` motion from Magny`s arm, indicating potential unconsciousness, the referee intervened, stopping the fight mere seconds before the bell. The arena, for a fleeting moment, erupted in a mixture of relief and disappointment, assuming a submission victory for Matthews.

Jake Matthews walks away after near-finish of Neil Magny at UFC Perth
Jake Matthews, momentarily believing he had secured a victory, walks away as the referee intervenes.

However, the narrative took an immediate, astonishing turn. As the choke was released, Magny, far from unconscious, sprang to his feet, vehemently protesting the stoppage. His protests were not just heard but seemingly acknowledged, leading to a decision that sent shockwaves through the commentary booth and the global MMA community: the referee, in a rare moment of on-the-spot self-correction, reversed his own call, declaring the fight was still on. This act, while perhaps stemming from a desire to rectify a potential error, immediately plunged the bout into a quagmire of debate regarding the rules, fighter safety, and the finality of a referee`s call.

From The Brink of Defeat to Record-Breaking Triumph

Given a second lease on life, Magny demonstrated the resilience that has defined his career. The `Haitian Sensation` managed to navigate the remainder of the fight, turning the tables in a truly remarkable display of veteran grit. In a stunning reversal of fortunes, it was Magny who secured a submission victory in the final round, forcing Matthews to tap. This win was not just another notch on his belt; it was his 24th UFC victory, placing him second only to the legendary Jim Miller (27) in company history for most wins. A historic achievement, undoubtedly, but one forever intertwined with the preceding controversy.

The Aftermath: A Firestorm of Fan Reaction and Calls for Overrule

The immediate post-fight analysis wasn`t solely focused on Magny`s incredible comeback or his record-setting performance. Instead, the discourse was dominated by the referee`s decision. Social media platforms quickly became a battleground for fervent fans and pundits, with a significant majority arguing that once a fight is stopped, it should remain stopped. The principle of finality, they contended, must prevail to maintain the integrity of the sport.

Common sentiments echoed across various platforms included:

  • “Insane turn of events. Never seen that before in the UFC.”
  • “Regardless, this fight needs to change to a no contest. The ref stopped the fight and then changed his mind once he realized he messed up, you can’t do that.”
  • “If I was Jake I would appeal this… for the UFC staff to allow it is crazy.”
  • “The ref pulled Matthews off of him with time on the clock. That is a stoppage. This should be overruled.”

The prevailing sentiment pointed towards a potential `no contest` ruling, highlighting the tension between a referee`s human fallibility and the strict regulations governing professional combat sports. While Magny achieved a monumental personal milestone, the circumstances surrounding his triumph ensure that this fight will be remembered not just for the victor, but for the unprecedented officiating decision that allowed it to continue.


The events at UFC Perth serve as a stark reminder of the razor-thin margins in professional MMA, where seconds, and indeed, subjective human judgment, can dramatically alter the course of history for fighters and the sport itself. Whether the referee`s decision was a courageous act of correction or a procedural misstep, it undeniably etched Neil Magny vs. Jake Matthews into the annals of UFC lore as one of the most contentious, and ultimately, unforgettable bouts.

By Ellis Thorne

Based in Liverpool, Ellis Thorne has established himself as one of the most respected voices in martial arts journalism. His in-depth features on traditional disciplines and emerging fight scenes have earned him a loyal following.

Related Post